- Twitter @DearAuntCrabby
Hall of Shame
Trump Crosses Arms and Snubs Washington Governor Jay Insless
Washington governor confronts Trump: ‘A little less tweeting here and a little more listening’
Washington Gov. Jay Inslee (D) criticized President Trump’s focus on arming teachers on Feb. 26, saying that teachers “don’t want to do that.” [1] Body language tells it all.
Gov. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) would rather increase law enforcement presence in schools as opposed to arming teachers with firearms. (Reuters)
References:
- The Washington Post, February 26, 2018 – Washington governor confronts Trump: ‘A little less tweeting here and a little more listening’
Trump Says He Will Run Towards Dispite Bone Spurs and No Military Training
“You don’t know until you test it, but I think — I really believe I’d run in there, even if I didn’t have a weapon,” Trump said, telling the assembled governors at a recent gathering at the White House. [1]
But he will do this with bone spurs? [2] … and NO military training?
President Trump’s assertion that he would have run toward the Parkland, Fla., gunman had he been near the school would have been a bold claim for just about anybody to make. [3]
References:
- Washington Post, February 26, 2018, Mike DeBonis and Anne Gearan – Trump stops short of full endorsement of gun proposals
- New York Times, August 1, 2016, Steve Eder and Dave Philipps – Donald Trump’s Draft Deferments: Four for College, One for Bad Feet
- Washington Post, February 26, 2018, Eli Rosenberg – Trump said he would charge a gunman. Here’s what he’s actually done in the face of danger.
“45” Lies About Viewers of the State of the Union
The REAL numbers of Nielsen Ratings:
BUT, more lies coming from the White House. “45” even states that only is base was tuning in on Fox. What about the rest of the world that watches non-biased television?
References:
- Nielson Ratings – Historical State of the Union Addresses
The “Buck” Stops With The President #TrumpShutdown
The Headlines – #TrumpShutdown
USA Today, January 20, 2018 – Trump’s one-year anniversary marked by shutdown instead of celebration
CNBC, January 20, 2018 – Trump’s dealmaker image is tarnished by US government shutdown
The Conversation, January 20, 2018 – Shutdown under a unified government? Blame Trump
The New Yorker, January 20, 2018 – On Trump’s First Anniversary, a Government Shutdown
Vox, January 20, 2018 – The government is shutting down because Donald Trump doesn’t know what he’s doing
Trump Lies about Golfing verses Presidential Work
CNN Writes;
A white truck tried to obscure CNN cameras from showing President Trump golfing in West Palm Beach, Florida. The White House has not responded to CNN’s questions about the truck.
References:
- CNN on YouTube.com, December 27, 2017 (MP4)
The ‘Dotard’ in the White House
‘Rocket Man’ vs. the ‘Dotard.’ Heaven help us all | Opinion”45″ has now earned the new title of “Dotard”. So exactly what is a “dotard”?
- an old person, especially one who has become weak or senile.
- an idiot, simpleton president who can’t take his eyes of the teleprompter
References:
- Dictionary.com – dotard
- nola.com – ‘Rocket Man’ vs. the ‘Dotard.’ Heaven help us all | Opinion
Trump is Destroying Another President Obama Legacy
Javier Gamboa writes:
As a DREAMer, I’m in complete disbelief that Donald Trump just eliminated DACA.
By ending this critical program, the livelihood of thousands of families like mine are now being threatened.
It’s a hateful reversal of President Obama’s historic immigrant protections — just to appeal to Republicans’ bigoted base and dismantle the Obama Legacy.
I remember the sense of belonging and relief I got when President Obama signed DACA five years ago. His action was clear: There’s a place for my fellow DREAMers and me in America.
Now, everything I’ve worked so hard for since I came to America could be come to an end because of Trump’s cowardness. [1]
Statement from President Obama
Immigration can be a controversial topic. We all want safe, secure borders and a dynamic economy, and people of goodwill can have legitimate disagreements about how to fix our immigration system so that everybody plays by the rules.
But that’s not what the action that the White House took today is about. This is about young people who grew up in America – kids who study in our schools, young adults who are starting careers, patriots who pledge allegiance to our flag. These Dreamers are Americans in their hearts, in their minds, in every single way but one: on paper. They were brought to this country by their parents, sometimes even as infants. They may not know a country besides ours. They may not even know a language besides English. They often have no idea they’re undocumented until they apply for a job, or college, or a driver’s license.
Over the years, politicians of both parties have worked together to write legislation that would have told these young people – our young people – that if your parents brought you here as a child, if you’ve been here a certain number of years, and if you’re willing to go to college or serve in our military, then you’ll get a chance to stay and earn your citizenship. And for years while I was President, I asked Congress to send me such a bill.
That bill never came. And because it made no sense to expel talented, driven, patriotic young people from the only country they know solely because of the actions of their parents, my administration acted to lift the shadow of deportation from these young people, so that they could continue to contribute to our communities and our country. We did so based on the well-established legal principle of prosecutorial discretion, deployed by Democratic and Republican presidents alike, because our immigration enforcement agencies have limited resources, and it makes sense to focus those resources on those who come illegally to this country to do us harm. Deportations of criminals went up. Some 800,000 young people stepped forward, met rigorous requirements, and went through background checks. And America grew stronger as a result.
But today, that shadow has been cast over some of our best and brightest young people once again. To target these young people is wrong – because they have done nothing wrong. It is self-defeating – because they want to start new businesses, staff our labs, serve in our military, and otherwise contribute to the country we love. And it is cruel. What if our kid’s science teacher, or our friendly neighbor turns out to be a Dreamer? Where are we supposed to send her? To a country she doesn’t know or remember, with a language she may not even speak?
Let’s be clear: the action taken today isn’t required legally. It’s a political decision, and a moral question. Whatever concerns or complaints Americans may have about immigration in general, we shouldn’t threaten the future of this group of young people who are here through no fault of their own, who pose no threat, who are not taking away anything from the rest of us. They are that pitcher on our kid’s softball team, that first responder who helps out his community after a disaster, that cadet in ROTC who wants nothing more than to wear the uniform of the country that gave him a chance. Kicking them out won’t lower the unemployment rate, or lighten anyone’s taxes, or raise anybody’s wages.
It is precisely because this action is contrary to our spirit, and to common sense, that business leaders, faith leaders, economists, and Americans of all political stripes called on the administration not to do what it did today. And now that the White House has shifted its responsibility for these young people to Congress, it’s up to Members of Congress to protect these young people and our future. I’m heartened by those who’ve suggested that they should. And I join my voice with the majority of Americans who hope they step up and do it with a sense of moral urgency that matches the urgency these young people feel.
Ultimately, this is about basic decency. This is about whether we are a people who kick hopeful young strivers out of America, or whether we treat them the way we’d want our own kids to be treated. It’s about who we are as a people – and who we want to be.
What makes us American is not a question of what we look like, or where our names come from, or the way we pray. What makes us American is our fidelity to a set of ideals – that all of us are created equal; that all of us deserve the chance to make of our lives what we will; that all of us share an obligation to stand up, speak out, and secure our most cherished values for the next generation. That’s how America has traveled this far. That’s how, if we keep at it, we will ultimately reach that more perfect union.
References:
- DCCC, September 5, 2017, Javier Gamboa
OMG… What Would “45” Think?
Republicans Lobby Against EPA Regulations
Hurricane Harvey ignited several explosions in a chemical plan near Crosby, Texas.
The French company that says its Houston-area chemical plant is spewing “noxious” smoke and may explode successfully pressed federal regulators to delay new regulations designed to improve safety procedures at chemical plants, according to federal records reviewed by International Business Times. The rules, which were set to go into effect this year, were halted by the Trump administration after a furious lobbying campaign by plant owner Arkema and its affiliated trade association, the American Chemistry Council, which represents a chemical industry that has poured tens of millions of dollars into federal elections. [1]
Governor Greg Abbott is not without blame.
Arkema has six production plants in Texas and has received more than $8.7 million worth of taxpayer subsidies from the state. Arkema’s Crosby plant — which OSHA fined more than $90,000 for ten “serious” violations earlier this year and has spewed smoke in Crosby — appears to be covered under the existing EPA rules because of the kinds of chemicals it uses. While Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott has given chemical companies legal cover to hide the locations of their EPA-regulated chemicals, the Associated Press reports that the imperiled Arkema facility houses large amounts of toxic sulfur dioxide and flammable methylpropen, which required Arkema to submit a risk management plan to the agency — and which would have subjected the company to the strengthened safety rules. [1]
References:
- International Business Times, August 31, 2017, David Sirota, Alex Kotch, Jay Cassano, Josh Keefe – Texas Republicans Helped Chemical Plant That Exploded Lobby Against Safety Rules